4.5 Article

The impact of a low-frequency chlorhexidine rinsing schedule on the subgingival microbiota (the TEETH clinical trial)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 9, Pages 1751-1758

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070138

Keywords

chlorhexidine; periodontitis

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE12215] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Information on the efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX) rinsing on the subgingival microbiota is limited. This study tested if intermittent CHX rinsing over 5 years had an impact on the subgingival microbiota. Methods: Subgingival plaque samples were analyzed by the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method in a double-blind randomized CHX rinse study. Results: A total of 210 subjects were included. The mean age of the subjects was 71.7 ( +/- 4.1) years, and 56.2% were women. Evidence of alveolar bone loss was found in 39% of subjects. Bacterial loads were not correlated significantly with probing depth. At year 5, subjects in the CHX rinse group with no evidence of bone loss presented with lower total bacterial counts than control subjects with no bone loss. The levels of the following bacteria were significantly lower in the CHX group: Lactobacillus acidophilus (P < 0.05), Eikenella corrodens (P < 0.05), Fusobacterium nucleatum sp. nucleatum (P < 0.01), Treponema denticola (P < 0.05), Leptotrichia buccalis (P < 0.05), and Eubactedum saburreum (P < 0.05). No differences in bacterial loads were found between CHX and control rinse subjects with alveolar bone loss. Conclusions: Older subjects with or without periodontitis carry a large variety of bacteria associated with periodontitis. Intermittent rinsing with CHX may provide a preventive benefit in reducing levels of bacteria but only in subjects without alveolar bone loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available