4.0 Article

The genetics of very early onset Alzheimer disease

Journal

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 149-156

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318145a8c8

Keywords

very early onset Alzheimer disease; dementia; genetic testing; presenilin 1

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG10133] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study was undertaken to clarify the genetics of very early onset Alzheimer disease (VEOAD), defined as AD beginning before age 35. Background: Early onset AD (EOAD) is defined by onset of symptoms before age 65, and affected individuals may harbor a mutation in presenilin 1 (PSEN1), presenilin 2 (PSEN2), or amyloid precursor protein. VEOAD is exceedingly rare, and PSEN1 mutations have been implicated. We encountered a man with phenotypic frontotemporal dementia beginning at age 32 and a strong family history Of an autosomal dominant dementia who was found at autopsy to have AD. Methods: Histologic and genetic analyses of the patient's brain were undertaken, and a review of all published VEOAD cases was performed. Results: Histologic findings were diagnostic of advanced stage AD. Genetic evaluation of brain tissue identified an intronic PSEN1 polymorphism; no known pathogenic mutation was found. Literature review (1934 to 2007) disclosed 101 cases of VEOAD; the youngest age of dementia onset was 24 years. In all cases in which definitive genetic analysis was available, either a PSEN1 mutation or linkage to chromosome 14 was found. Conclusions: VEOAD can present with atypical clinical features, including findings suggestive of frontotemporal dementia. All reported cases of VEOAD with conclusive genetic analysis seem to be associated with PSEN1 mutations. Genetic testing in adults younger than 35 with dementia can identify the genetic defect and assist in diagnosis and family counseling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available