4.7 Article

Characterization of diabetic nephropathy by urinary proteomic analysis:: Identification of a processed ubiquitin form as a differentially excreted protein in diabetic nephropathy patients

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 9, Pages 1636-1645

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088260

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Identification of markers for prediction of the clinical course of diabetic nephropathy remains a major challenge in disease management. We established a proteomics approach for identification of diabetic nephropathy-related biomarkers in urine. Methods: We used SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry and SAX2 protein arrays to compare protein profiles from urine of 4 defined patient groups. Samples from patients with type 2 diabetes (DM; n = 45) without nephropathy and without microalbuminuria (DMWNP), patients with DM with macro- or microalbuminuria (DM-NP; n = 38), patients with proteinuria due to nondiabetic renal disease (n = 34), and healthy controls (n = 45) were analyzed. Anionic exchange, reversedphase fractionation, gel electrophoresis, and mass spectrometry were used to isolate and identify proteins with high discriminatory power. Results: A protein with mlz 6188 (P <0.0000004) was strongly released in the urine of healthy controls, patients with proteinuria due to nondiabetic disease, and DM-WNP in contrast to DM-NP patients. An mlz 14 766 protein (P <0.00008) was selectively excreted in the urine of DM-NP patients, whereas the protein with mlz 11774 (P <0.000004) was significantly excreted by patients with proteinuria and DM-NP. The mlz 11774 and mlz 14 766 mass peaks were identified as beta-microglobulin and UbA52, a ubiquitin ribosomal fusion protein, respectively. The protein with mlz 6188 was identified as a processed form of ubiquitin. Conclusion: The release of high amounts of UbA52 in urine of DM-NP patients could serve as a diagnostic marker, whereas the lack of the short form of ubiquitin raises interesting questions about the pathophysiology. (c) 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available