4.5 Article

Two-dimensional standing wave total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy: Superresolution imaging of single molecular and biological specimens

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 1747-1757

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.097907

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL64858, P01 HL064858] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of high resolution, high speed imaging techniques allows the study of dynamical processes in biological systems. Lateral resolution improvement of up to a factor of 2 has been achieved using structured illumination. In a total internal reflection fluorescence microscope, an evanescence excitation field is formed as light is total internally reflected at an interface between a high and a low index medium. The,100 nm penetration depth of evanescence field ensures a thin excitation region resulting in low background fluorescence. We present even higher resolution wide-field biological imaging by use of standing wave total internal reflection fluorescence (SW-TIRF). Evanescent standing wave ( SW) illumination is used to generate a sinusoidal high spatial frequency fringe pattern on specimen for lateral resolution enhancement. To prevent thermal drift of the SW, novel detection and estimation of the SW phase with real-time feedback control is devised for the stabilization and control of the fringe phase. SW-TIRF is a wide-field superresolution technique with resolution better than a fifth of emission wavelength or; 100 nm lateral resolution. We demonstrate the performance of the SW-TIRF microscopy using one-and two directional SW illumination with a biological sample of cellular actin cytoskeleton of mouse fibroblast cells as well as single semiconductor nanocrystal molecules. The results confirm the superior resolution of SW-TIRF in addition to the merit of a high signal/background ratio from TIRF microscopy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available