4.2 Article

The Black diaspora and health inequalities in the US and England: does where you go and how you get there make a difference?

Journal

SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 811-830

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01043.x

Keywords

ethnicity; race; Caribbean; black; inequalities in health; international comparison

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [5R01 AG 020202 82] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [T32 MH016806, 1T32 MH 67555, T32 MH067555, U01 MH 57716, 1T01 MH 58565, U01 MH057716] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [5TMH 16806] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relatively poor health of Black American people in the US and Black Caribbean people in England is a consistent finding in the health inequalities literature. Indeed, there are many similarities between the health, social, economic and demographic profiles of these two groups. However, there is evidence that Caribbean people in the US are faring considerably better. This paper explores differences in the social and economic position of Black American, Black Caribbean and white people in the US and Black Caribbean and white people in England, how these relate to ethnic inequalities in health, and may be underpinned by differences in patterns and contexts of migration. We use similar surveys from the US and England to explore these questions. The US data were drawn from the National Survey of American Life and the English data were drawn from the Health Survey for England and a follow up study. Findings show the advantaged health position of Caribbean American people in comparison with both Caribbean people in England and Black American people. Multivariate analyses indicate that these differences, and the differences in health between Black and white people in the two countries, are a consequence of social and economic inequalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available