4.5 Article

The effect of mouth leak and humidification during nasal non-invasive ventilation

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages 1874-1879

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.05.005

Keywords

respiratory; impairment; non-invasive; ventilation; airway resistance; visual analogue scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Poor mask fit and mouth leak are associated with nasal symptoms and poor sleep quality in patients receiving domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) through a nasal mask. Normal subjects receiving continuous positive airways pressure demonstrate increased nasal resistance following periods of mouth leak. This study explores the effect of mouth leak during pressure-targeted nasal NIV, and whether this results in increased nasal resistance and consequently a reduction in effective ventilatory support. Methods: A randomised crossover study of 16 normal subjects was performed on separate days. Comparison was made of the effect of 5 min of mouth leak during daytime nasal NIV with and without heated humidification. Expired tidal volume (V-T), nasal resistance (R-N), and patient comfort were measured. Results: Mean change (Delta) in V-T and R-N were significantly less following mouth leak with heated humidification compared to the without (Delta V-T -36 +/- 65ml vs. -88 +/- 50ml, p < 0.001; Delta R-N +0.9 +/- 0.4 vs. +2.0 +/- 0.7cmH(2)Ols(-1), p < 0.001). Baseline comfort was worse without humidification (5.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.4, p < 0.01), and only deteriorated following mouth leak without humidification. Conclusions: In normal subjects, heated humidification during nasal NIV attenuates the adverse effects of mouth leak on effective tidal volume, nasal resistance and improves overall comfort. Heated humidification should be considered as part of an approach to patients who are troubled with nasal symptoms, once leak has been minimised. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available