4.6 Article

Methodology optimization for quantification of total phenolics and individual phenolic acids in sweetpotato (lpomoea batatas L.) roots

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue 7, Pages C412-C416

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00448.x

Keywords

antioxidant; caffeic acid; chlorogenic acid; folin reagents; HPLC; Ipomoea batatas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenolic acids are one of the several classes of naturally occuring antioxidant compounds found in sweetpotatoes. Simplified, robust, and rapid methodologies were optimized to quantify total and individual phenolic acids in sweetpotato roots. Total phenolic acid content was quantified spectrophotometrically using both Folin Denis and Folin-Ciocalteu reagent gave an overestimation of total phenolic acids due to the absorbance of interfering compounds (that is, reducing sugars and ascorbic acid). Individual phenolic acids were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using the latest in column technology. Four reversed-phase C18 analytical columns with different properties (dimensions, particle size, particle shape, pore size, and carbon load) were compared. Three different mobile phases using isocratic conditions were also evaluated. Acolumn (4.6 x 150 mm) packed with 5-mu m spherical silica particles of pore size 110 angstrom combined with 14% carbon load provided the best and fast separation of individual phenolic acids (that is, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, and 3 isomers of dicaffeoylquinic acid) with a total analysis time of less than 7 min. Among the 3 mobile phases tested, a mobile phase consisting of 1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution: acetonitrile: 2-propanol, pH 2.5 (70:22:8 v/v/v) gave adequate separation. Among the solvents tested, aqueous mixtures (80:20, solvent:water) of methanol and ethanol provided higher phenolic acid extraction efficiency than the aqueous mixture of acetone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available