4.6 Article

Sciatic nerve block with resiniferatoxin: An electron microscopic study of unmyelinated fibers in the rat

Journal

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 825-831

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000277491.40055.47

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM065834] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Perineural administration of the naturally occurring vanilloids (capsaicin, resiniferatoxin [RTX]) produces selective nociceptive blockade. Studies using perineural vanilloids in high concentrations suggest that they can cause a degeneration of unmyelinated fibers. However, electron microscopic studies of local vanilloid toxicity produced conflicting outcomes. In the present study, we sought to determine whether RTX-induced reversible sciatic nerve block results in the degenerative changes of unmyelinated fibers., METHODS: In rat experiments, RTX was administered percutaneously at the sciatic nerve. The effect of RTX was monitored by measuring the rat's response to noxious heat. The sciatic nerves were removed 48 h after the blockade initiation. Quantitative electron microscopic evaluation of the unmyelinated fibers was performed in three groups of animals: RTX 0.0001% (0.1 mu g), RTX 0.001% (1 mu g), and control (RTX vehicle, 0.1 mL). RESULTS: Cross-sections of the sciatic nerve 48 h after the initiation of RTX-induced reversible nerve blockade appeared essentially normal. One rarely observed finding was the irregularly compacted membranous deposits in the unmyelinated axons. The frequency of this finding was approximately one per thousand fibers with both concentrations of RTX. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that a selective and long-lasting sciatic nerve block (up to 2 wk) can be provided by RTX without any significant damage to the unmyelinated nerve fibers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available