4.3 Article

Prevalence of conduction delay of the right atrium in patients with SSS: implications for pacing site selection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 706-712

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32801105c7

Keywords

atrial fibrillation; inter-atrial septum pacing; right atrial appendage pacing; sinus node dysfunction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To evaluate the prevalence of severe right atrial conduction delay in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrial fibrillation (AF) and the effects of pacing in the right atrial appendage (RAA) and in the inter-atrial septum (IAS). Methods Forty-two patients (15 male, 72 7 years) underwent electrophysiologic study to measure the difference between the conduction time from RAA to coronary sinus ostium during stimulation at 600 ms and after extrastimulus (Delta CTos). Patients were classified as group A if Delta CTos > 60 ms and group B if < 60 ms. Each Group was randomized to RAA/IAS pacing and algorithms ON/OFF. Results Fifteen patients (36%, group A) had Delta CTos = 76 11 ms and 27 patients (64%, group 13) had Delta CTos = 36 20 ms. Twenty-two patients were paced at the RAA and 20 at the IAS. During the study, no AF recurrences were reported in 11 of 42 (26%) patients, independently of RAA or IAS pacing. Patients from group A and RAA pacing had 0.79 +/- 0.81 episodes of AF/day during DDD, which increased to 1.52 +/- 1.41 episodes of AF/day during DDDR + Aig (P = 0.046). Those with IAS pacing had 0.5 +/- 0.24 episodes of AF/day during DDD, which decreased to 0.06 +/- 0.08 episodes of AF/day during DDDR + Alg (P = 0.06). In group B, no differences were reported between pacing sites and pacing modes. Conclusions Severe right atrial conduction delay is present in one-third of patients with SND and AF: continuous pacing at the IAS is superior to RAA for AF recurrences. In patients without severe conduction delay, no differences between pacing site or mode were observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available