4.4 Article

The giant fibrillar center:: A nucleolar structure enriched in upstream binding factor (UBF) that appears in transcriptionally more active sensory ganglia neurons

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 3, Pages 451-461

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.05.004

Keywords

sensory ganglia neurons; nucleolus; giant fibrillar centers; UBF; SUMO-1; ubiquitin-proteasome system; 5'-fluorouridine transcription assay; neuronal differentiation; cajal bodies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the molecular organization, neuronal distribution and cellular differentiation dynamics of the giant fibrillar centers (GFCs) of nucleoli in rat sensory ganglia neurons. The GFC appeared as a round nucleolar domain (1-2 mu m in diameter) partially surrounded by the dense fibrillar component and accompanied by numerous small FCs. By immunocytochemistry, the GFC concentrated the upstream binding factor, which may serve as a marker of this structure, and also contain RNA polymerase 1, DNA topoisomerase 1, SUMO-1 and Ubc9. However, they lack ubiquitin-proteasome conjugates and 20S proteasome. Transcription assay with 5'-fluorouridine incorporation revealed the presence of nascent RNA on the dense fibrillar component of the neuronal nucleolus, but not within the low electron-density area of the GFC. The formation of GFCs is neuronal size dependent: they were found in 58%, 30% and 0% of the large, medium and small neurons, respectively. GFCs first appeared during the postnatal period, concomitantly with a stage of neuronal growth, myelination and bioelectrical maturation. GFCs were not observed in segregated nucleoli induced by severe inhibition of RNA synthesis. We suggest that the formation of GFCs is associated with a high rate of ribosome biogenesis of the transcriptionally more active large-size neurons. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available