4.6 Article

Missed opportunities for secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease in elderly British men from 1999 to 2005: a population-based study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 251-257

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm040

Keywords

cerebrovascular disease; medication use; secondary prevention

Funding

  1. MRC [G0501859] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0501859] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective We examined patterns in medication use for secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease in older British men from 1999 to 2005, and investigated socio-clemographic and disease-related influences on medication use. Methods Percentage use of antiplatelet drugs, blood pressure-lowering drugs and statins use was calculated in men, aged 65-87 years in 2005, who had been diagnosed with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) from a population-based cohort based in one general practice in each of 24 British towns. Results In 1999, most men with cerebrovascular disease received antiplatelet drugs (67%). However, a few received blood pressure-lowering drugs (50%) and statins (113%). By 2005, the use of all drug types had increased; at least half of the patients received each type of drug. However, only one-third of patients received all three medication types and combined blood pressure treatment was limited. Older age, a diagnosis of TIA rather than stroke and absence of co-existing coronary heart disease were associated with lower rates of use of specific medication categories. Conclusion Despite improvements in secondary prevention medication use, there is scope for achieving the full potential of these medications, particularly by increasing combination blood pressure treatment and statin use and ensuring that older patients receive the benefits of prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available