4.7 Article

Controls on spatial and temporal variation of nutrient uptake in three Michigan headwater streams

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 1964-1977

Publisher

AMER SOC LIMNOLOGY OCEANOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.5.1964

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measured whole-stream uptake of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3-), and phosphate (as soluble reactive phosphorus [ SRP]) in two reaches of three forested headwater streams eight times from May 2003 to April 2004 (n = 46 measurements per nutrient type). We also measured factors that could affect uptake, including ambient nutrient concentrations, whole-stream metabolism, and organic matter standing stocks. In all three streams, we measured the highest rates of NH4+ and NO3-uptake velocity (V-f) during the spring. Low ambient NH4+ concentrations limited NH4+ uptake (U) in two streams. In one stream, when ambient NO3- concentrations increased during summer, NO{3 Vf decreased. Temporal patterns of SRP Vf varied among streams, but were unrelated to variability in ambient SRP concentration. However, in all three streams, seasonal variation in SRP Vf was strongly influenced by heterotrophic metabolism (as measured by community respiration; State Creek r = 0.81, p = 0.03; Shane Creek r = 0.89, p < 0.01; Walton Creek r = 0.91, p < 0.01). Although heterotrophic processes typically dominate in forested headwater streams, we found that variability in nutrient uptake among streams was also explained by variables related to autotrophic activity (i. e., proportion coverage of large inorganic substrata and gross primary production). We suggest that the unexpected influence of autotrophy in this study was a result of stream sampling frequency, which included winter and spring-seasons not typically sampled. Our study demonstrates that examining nutrient uptake across streams and during different seasons can provide insight into factors controlling nutrient uptake parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available