Journal
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 747-756Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01769.x
Keywords
Bayesian clustering; computer programs; population membership; relative performances; spatial assignment methods; spatial genetics
Ask authors/readers for more resources
On the basis of simulated data, this study compares the relative performances of the Bayesian clustering computer programs STRUCTURE, GENELAND, GENECLUST and a new program named TESS. While these four programs can detect population genetic structure from multilocus genotypes, only the last three ones include simultaneous analysis from geographical data. The programs are compared with respect to their abilities to infer the number of populations, to estimate membership probabilities, and to detect genetic discontinuities and clinal variation. The results suggest that combining analyses using TESS and STRUCTURE offers a convenient way to address inference of spatial population structure.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available