4.4 Article

Proposed minimum reporting standards for data analysis in metabolomics

Journal

METABOLOMICS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 231-241

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-007-0081-3

Keywords

chemometrics; multivariate; megavariate; unsupervised learning; supervised learning; informatics; bioinformatics; statistics; biostatistics; machine learning; statistical learning

Funding

  1. MRC [MC_qA137293] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C519038/1, MET20484] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_qA137293] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this group is to define the reporting requirements associated with the statistical analysis (including univariate, multivariate, informatics, machine learning etc.) of metabolite data with respect to other measured/collected experimental data (often called metadata). These definitions will embrace as many aspects of a complete metabolomics study as possible at this time. In chronological order this will include: Experimental Design, both in terms of sample collection/matching, and data acquisition scheduling of samples through whichever spectroscopic technology used; Deconvolution (if required); Pre-processing, for example, data cleaning, outlier detection, row/column scaling, or other transformations; Definition and parameterization of subsequent visualizations and Statistical/Machine learning Methods applied to the dataset; If required, a clear definition of the Model Validation Scheme used (including how data are split into training/validation/test sets); Formal indication on whether the data analysis has been Independently Tested (either by experimental reproduction, or blind hold out test set). Finally, data interpretation and the visual representations and hypotheses obtained from the data analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available