4.0 Article

Myosin heavy chain composition and fiber size of the cricopharyngeus muscle in patients with achalasia and normal subjects

Journal

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 9, Pages 643-646

Publisher

ANNALS PUBL CO
DOI: 10.1177/000348940711600903

Keywords

cricopharyngeus; dysphagia; myosin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Cricopharyngeal achalasia (CA) can be defined as inadequate opening of the cricopharyngeus muscle (CPM) resulting in dysphagia. Myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform fiber type cornposition and size are key determinants of muscle function. These parameters have not been described in CA. It is hypothesized that there is a difference between the MHC isoform composition of the CPM in patients with the clinical diagnosis of CA and that in normal subjects. Methods: Patients who had received prior botulinum were excluded. The MHC fiber type composition and size in patients and cadaveric controls were determined by adenosine triphosphatase staining and image analysis. Results: The CPMs of 12 CA patients (6 male, 6 female; mean age, 61 years) and 5 control cadaveric Subjects (3 male, 2 female; mean age, 67 years) were analyzed. There were relatively fewer type I fibers (67%) in patients with CA than in controls (81%), but the difference was not significant (p = .18). Type I fibers were slightly smaller in CA patients (38.7 mu m) than in controls (47.2 mu m), but this was not significantly different (p > .05). Of the 12 CA patients, 3 had type II predominance, a feature not seen in normal Subjects. Conclusions: Patients with CA had relatively fewer type I fibers, although the difference was not statistically significant. The MHC isoform composition and fiber size were not different between CA patients and normal subjects. This is the first report to characterize the CPM in patients with CA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available