4.6 Article

Highly sensitive routine method for urinary 3-hydroxybenzo[a]pyrene quantitation using liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection and automated off-line solid phase extraction

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages 1183-1191

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0an00428f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de Securite Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail
  2. Direction Regionale du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Formation Professionnelle
  3. Cluster Environnement of the region Rhone-Alpes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many workers and also the general population are exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) was recently classified as carcinogenic for humans (group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Biomonitoring of PAHs exposure is usually performed by urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) analysis. 1-OHP is a metabolite of pyrene, a non-carcinogenic PAH. In this work, we developed a very simple but highly sensitive analytical method of quantifying one urinary metabolite of BaP, 3-hydroxybenzo[a]pyrene (3-OHBaP), to evaluate carcinogenic PAHs exposure. After hydrolysis of 10 mL urine for two hours and concentration by automated off-line solid phase extraction, the sample was injected in a column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography fluorescence detection system. The limit of quantification was 0.2 pmol L-1 (0.05 ng L-1) and the limit of detection was estimated at 0.07 pmol L-1 (0.02 ng L-1). Linearity was established for 3-OHBaP concentrations ranging from 0.4 to 74.5 pmol L-1 (0.1 to 20 ng L-1). Relative within-day standard deviation was less than 3% and relative between-day standard deviation was less than 4%. In non-occupationally exposed subjects, median concentrations for smokers compared with non-smokers were 3.5 times higher for 1-OHP (p < 0.001) and 2 times higher for 3-OHBaP (p < 0.05). The two urinary biomarkers were correlated in smokers (rho = 0.636; p < 0.05; n = 10) but not in non-smokers (rho = 0.09; p > 0.05; n = 21).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available