4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: The muscle-specific microRNAs miR-1 and miR-133 produce opposing effects on apoptosis by targeting HSP60, HSP70 and caspase-9 in cardiomyocytes (Retracted article. See vol. 124, pg. 3187, 2011)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 120, Issue 17, Pages 3045-3052

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.010728

Keywords

miR-1; miR-133; apoptosis; HSP60; HSP70; caspase-9

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microRNAs miR-1 and miR-133 are preferentially expressed in cardiac and skeletal muscles and have been shown to regulate differentiation and proliferation of these cells. We report here a novel aspect of cellular function of miR-1 and miR-133 regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. miR-1 and miR-133 produced opposing effects on apoptosis, induced by oxidative stress in H9c2 rat ventricular cells, with miR-1 being pro-apoptotic and miR-133 being antiapoptotic. miR-1 level was significantly increased in response to oxidative stress. We identified single target sites for miR-1 only, in the 3 '- untranslated regions of the HSP60 and HSP70 genes, and multiple putative target sites for miR-133 throughout the sequence of the caspase-9 gene. miR-1 reduced the levels of HSP60 and HSP70 proteins without changing their transcript levels, whereas miR-133 did not affect HSP60 and HSP70 expression at all. By contrast, miR-133 repressed caspase-9 expression at both the protein and mRNA levels. The post-transcriptional repression of HSP60 and HSP70 and caspase-9 was further confirmed by luciferase reporter experiments. Our results indicate that miR-1 and miR-133 are involved in regulating cell fate with increased miR-1 and/or decreased miR-133 levels favoring apoptosis and decreased miR-1 and/or miR133 levels favoring survival. Post-transcriptional repression of HSP60 and HSP70 by miR-1 and of caspase-9 by miR133 contributes significantly to their opposing actions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available