4.6 Article

Sloan digital sky survey standard star catalog for stripe 82: The dawn of industrial 1% optical photometry

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 134, Issue 3, Pages 973-998

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/519976

Keywords

catalogs; instrumentation : photometers; methods : data analysis; standards; surveys; techniques : photometric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a standard star catalog constructed using multiple SDSS photometric observations ( at least four per band, with a median of 10) in the ugriz system. The catalog includes 1.01 million nonvariable unresolved objects from the equatorial stripe 82 (vertical bar delta(J2000.0)vertical bar < 1.266 degrees) in the right ascension range 20(h)34(m)-4(h)00(m) and with the corresponding r-band ( approximately Johnson V-band) magnitudes in the range 14-22. The distributions of measurements for individual sources demonstrate that the photometric pipeline correctly estimates random photometric errors, which are below 0.01 mag for stars brighter than 19.5, 20.5, 20.5, 20, and 18.5 in ugriz, respectively ( about twice as good as for individual SDSS runs). Several independent tests of the internal consistency suggest that the spatial variation of photometric zero points is not larger than similar to 0.01 mag (rms). In addition to being the largest available data set with optical photometry internally consistent at the similar to 1% level, this catalog provides a practical definition of the SDSS photometric system. Using this catalog, we show that photometric zero points for SDSS observing runs can be calibrated within a nominal uncertainty of 2% even for data obtained through 1 mag thick clouds, and we demonstrate the existence of He and H white dwarf sequences using photometric data alone. Based on the properties of this catalog, we conclude that upcoming large-scale optical surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope will be capable of delivering robust 1% photometry for billions of sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available