4.6 Review

Single molecule sensing by nanopores and nanopore devices

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages 441-451

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b907735a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [0546165]
  2. NIH [GM079613]
  3. University of Missouri Startup Fund and Research Board
  4. National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [C06-RR-016489-01]
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [K23RR016489] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM079613] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular-scale pore structures, called nanopores, can be assembled by protein ion channels through genetic engineering or be artificially fabricated on solid substrates using fashion nanotechnology. When target molecules interact with the functionalized lumen of a nanopore, they characteristically block the ion pathway. The resulting conductance changes allow for identification of single molecules and quantification of target species in the mixture. In this review, we first overview nanopore-based sensory techniques that have been created for the detection of myriad biomedical targets, from metal ions, drug compounds, and cellular second messengers to proteins and DNA. Then we introduce our recent discoveries in nanopore single molecule detection: (1) using the protein nanopore to study folding/unfolding of the G-quadruplex aptamer; (2) creating a portable and durable biochip that is integrated with a single-protein pore sensor (this chip is compared with recently developed protein pore sensors based on stabilized bilayers on glass nanopore membranes and droplet interface bilayer); and (3) creating a glass nanopore-terminated probe for single-molecule DNA detection, chiral enantiomer discrimination, and identification of the bioterrorist agent ricin with an aptamer-encoded nanopore.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available