4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Gamete origin in relation to early embryo development

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages S131-S137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.03.019

Keywords

gamete origin; embryo; apoptosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fertilization in vivo requires a complex series of selection events to occur in order to guarantee that only the fittest gametes take part in the fusion process and give rise to a viable embryo. Conventional practice in bovine in vitro fertilization however is to select oocytes and sperm by quite crude procedures. It is therefore not inconceivable that essentially unfit gametes may drive aberrant embryo development in vitro. Abnormal embryonic cells are being removed by apoptosis, which is a physiological process in embryos. Only an excess or a lack of apoptosis can lead to embryonic death or abnormal development. Suboptimal culture conditions undoubtedly contribute to undue embryonic apoptosis, but the intrinsic quality of the oocyte may also be a causative factor. It is generally accepted that the oocyte is in control of early embryogenesis, but is it also in control of future embryonic suicide? Is a compromised follicular environment predestining the oocyte to a dire fate? What is the contribution of the cumulus cells to oocyte quality, and can they rescue it from early demise? And what can be said about the origin of the spermatozoa? Research in human in vitro fertilization has definitely shown that factors such as paternal age, smoking and other sperm stressors can contribute to abnormal embryo development and even diseased offspring. This review will address the questions raised above, and will describe what is known about the cellular and molecular biology that may account for abnormal bovine embryo development caused by gamete origin. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available