Journal
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 37, Issue 2-3, Pages 201-210Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00266.x
Keywords
technology adoption; rice; NERICA; west Africa; average treatment effect
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article shows that the observed sample adoption rate does not consistently estimate the population adoption rate even if the sample is random. It is proved that instead the sample adoption rate is a consistent estimate of the population joint exposure and adoption rate, which does not inform about adoption per se. Likewise, it is shown that a model of adoption with observed adoption outcome as a dependent variable and where exposure to the technology is not observed and controlled for cannot yield consistent estimates of the determinants of adoption. The article uses the counterfactual outcomes framework to show that the true population adoption rate corresponds to what is defined in the modem policy evaluation literature as the average treatment effect (ATE), which measures the effect or impact of a treatment on a person randomly selected in the population. In the adoption context, a treatment corresponds to exposure to the technology. The article uses the ATE estimation framework to derive consistent nonparametric and parametric estimators of population adoption rates and their determinants and applies the results to consistently estimate the population adoption rates and determinants of the NERICA (New Rice for Africa) rice varieties in cote d'Ivoire. The ATE methodological approach developed in the article has significant policy implications with respect to judging the intrinsic merit of a new technology in terms of its potential demand by the target population independently of issues related to its accessibility and in terms of the decision to invest or not in its wide-scale dissemination.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available