4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

The global network: a prospective study of stillbirths in developing countries

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.004

Keywords

developing country; intrapartum stillbirth; stillbirth

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U01 HD0434475, U01 HD040657, U01 HD040477, U01 HD040607-02, U01 HD040636, U01 HD042372, U01 HD040607, U01 HD043464, U24 HD092094] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine stillbirth rates in a multisite population-based study in community settings in the developing world. STUDY DESIGN: Outcomes of all community deliveries in 5 resource-poor countries ( Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, India, Zambia, and Pakistan) and in 1 mid-level country ( Argentina) were evaluated prospectively over an 18-month period. Births of > 1000 g with no signs of life were defined as stillbirth. RESULTS: Outcomes of 60,324 deliveries were included. Stillbirth rates ranged from 34 per 1000 in Pakistan to 9 per 1000 births in Argentina. Increased stillbirth rates were associated significantly with lower skilled providers, out-of-hospital births, and low cesarean section rates. Maceration was present in 17.2% of stillbirths. CONCLUSION: The stillbirth rates among births of >= 1000 g in these developing countries were substantially higher than reported stillbirth rates in developed countries (3-5/1000 births). Because most developed countries define stillbirth as >= 20 weeks of gestation or >= 500 g and because almost one-half of all stillbirths are < 1000 g, the developing/ developed country difference is actually larger than apparent from this study. Maceration was uncommon, which indicates that most of the deaths probably occurred during labor. The low rates of physician attendance, hospital delivery, and cesarean section deliveries suggest that stillbirth rates could be reduced by access to higher quality institutional deliveries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available