3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Use of admission serum lactate and sodium levels to predict mortality in necrotizing soft-tissue infections

Journal

ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Volume 142, Issue 9, Pages 840-844

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.9.840

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothesis: Simple admission laboratory values can be used to classify patients with necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) into high and low mortality risk groups. Design: Chart review. Setting: Public teaching hospital. Patients: All patients with NSTI from 1997 through 2006. Interventions: Variables analyzed included medical history, admission vital signs, laboratory values, and microbiologic findings. Data analyses included univariate and classification and regression tree analyses. Main Outcome Measure: Mortality. Results: One hundred twenty-four patients were identified with NSTI. The overall mortality rate was 21 of 124 (17%). On univariate analysis, factors associated with mortality included a history of cancer (P=.03), intravenous drug abuse (P<.001), low systolic blood pressure on admission (P=.03),base deficit (P=.009), and elevated white blood cell count (P=.06). On exploratory classification and regression tree analysis, admission serum lactate and sodium levels were predictors of mortality, with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 28%, positive predictive value of 23%, and negative predictive value of 100%. A serum lactate level greater than or equal to 54.1 mg/dL (6 mmol/L) alone was associated with a 32% mortality, whereas a serum sodium level greater than or equal to 135 mEq/L combined with a lactate level less than 54.1 mg/dL was associated with a mortality of 0%. Conclusions: Mortality for NSTIs remains high. A simple model, using admission serum lactate and serum sodium levels, may help identify patients at greatest risk for death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available