4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Failure analysis of a crude oil pipeline

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 978-994

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.001

Keywords

crude oil pipeline; API 5L X46 steel; welded tube; through-thickness cracking; wet-H2S corrosion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transversal cracking of a seamed API 5L X46 steel tube belonging to a crude oil pipeline was investigated. The main cracking nucleated in the internal surface of the tube, at the boundary between the heat-affected zone (HAZ) and the weld metal, propagating in a stable mode along the radial and longitudinal directions. Stress raisers, such as welding defects and corrosion pits, were associated to the cracking nucleation. The internal surface of the tube and the cracking surfaces presented a deposit layer, which was rich in Fe, O and S. Diffractometry on the internal identified the presence of a multilayered corrosion deposit, formed by iron oxide (Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) and iron sulphides, such as pyrrhotite, mackinawite and pyrite, indicating the action of a H2S corrosion assisted mechanism. The crack propagation path did not depend on the welding macrostructure, growing perpendicular to both the internal surface and main tensile stresses. Crack propagation was, however, microstructure sensitive, with a more intense branching occurring inside the base metal rather than the HAZ region. Both regions presented cracking (blistering) of the sulphide/matrix interface and microfractographic examination indicated the action of a ductile fracture mechanism linking the H-2 blisters, reinforcing the idea that atomic hydrogen association rather than hydrogen embrittlement was the active mechanism during the cracking of the pipeline. These observations indicated that failure of the pipeline occurred by a stress-oriented hydrogen-induced cracking (SOHIC) mechanism. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available