4.4 Article

Effects of cell volume regulating osmolytes on glycerol 3-phosphate binding to triosephosphate isomerase

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 35, Pages 10055-10062

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi700990d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB001958, R01 EB001958-24, R01 EB001958] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM068036, GM049760, P01 GM068036-05, R01 GM049760, GM068036] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During cell volume regulation, intracellular concentration changes occur in both inorganic and organic osmolytes in order to balance the extracellular osmotic stress and maintain cell volume homeostasis. Generally, salt and urea increase the K-m's of enzymes and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) counteracts these effects by decreasing K-m's. The hypothesis to account for these effects is that urea and salt shift the native state ensemble of the enzyme toward conformers that are substrate-binding incompetent (BI), while TMAO shifts the ensemble toward binding competent (BC) species. K-m's are often complex assemblies of rate constants involving several elementary steps in catalysis, so to better understand osmolyte effects we have focused on a single elementary event, substrate binding. We test the conformational shift hypothesis by evaluating the effects of salt, urea, and TMAO on the mechanism of binding glycerol 3-phosphate, a substrate analogue, to yeast triosephosphate isomerase. Temperature-jump kinetic measurements promote a mechanism consistent with osmolyte-induced shifts in the [BI]/[BC] ratio of enzyme conformers. Importantly, salt significantly affects the binding constant through its effect on the activity coefficients of substrate, enzyme, and enzyme-substrate complex, and it is likely that TMAO and urea affect activity coefficients as well. Results indicate that the conformational shift hypothesis alone does not account for the effects of osmolytes on K-m's.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available