4.6 Article

Vesicular coacervative extraction of bisphenols and their diglycidyl ethers from sewage and river water

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1163, Issue 1-2, Pages 269-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.06.024

Keywords

coacervative extraction; vesicles; bisphenols; bisphenols diglycidyl ethers; sewage; river; environmental analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coacervates made up of vesicles of decanoic acid, induced by tetrabutyl ammonium, are proposed for the extraction of bisphenols A and F (BPA, BPF) and their corresponding diglycidyl ethers (BADGE and BFDGE) from sewage and river water. The driving forces for the extraction were hydrophobic, hydrogen bonding and pi-cation. Actual concentration factors depended mainly on the amount of decanoic acid and tetrabutylammonium making up the coacervate. Under optimal experimental conditions, they were 569, 561, 500 and 477 for BPA, BPF, BADGE and BFGDE, respectively. Extractions were independent of the presence of salts up to 1 M and the temperature up to 60 degrees C. Equilibrium conditions were reached in 5 min. The combination of vesicular coacervation with liquid chromatography and fluorescence detection at lambda(exc) 278 nm and lambda(em) 306nm permitted the quantification of the target pollutants with detection limits of 9-10 ng/L. The method was applied to their determination in raw and treated sewage and river samples. No clean-up steps were necessary. Apparent recoveries of bisphenols and their diglycidyl ethers in the environmental water samples ranged from 95 to 102%. The concentrations of BPA and BPF in samples were between 0.1 and 1.7 mu g/L. BADGE was found mainly in wastewater influents, at concentrations ranging between 0.49 and 1.15 mu g/L, whereas BFDGE was only found in one of the I I samples analysed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available