4.8 Article

Direct propylene epoxidation over/barium-promoted Au/Ti-TUD catalysts with H2 and O2:: Effect of Au particle size

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 250, Issue 2, Pages 350-359

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.06.006

Keywords

propylene; epoxidation; gold; nanoparticle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A catalyst consisting of gold supported on a Ti-containing silicate mesoporous material (TUD) with 13-nm pores was used for the epoxidation of propylene with mixtures of H-2 and O-2. The catalyst activity was enhanced by the addition of a Ba promoter. The pH of deposition was important in controlling the gold loading and particle size. A pH of 7 gave a Au loading of 2.7 wt% and an average particle size of 2.0 nm, as determined by transmission electron microscopy, whereas a pH of 9 produced a much lower Au loading of 0.11 wt% and smaller particles of size about 0.9 nm, as estimated by X-ray absorption fine structure measurements. At 423 K and 0.1 MPa total pressure, the catalyst prepared at pH 7 gave a steady-state propylene conversion of 2.1%, a propylene oxide (PO) selectivity of 79%, and a H-2 efficiency of 3.8%, whereas that prepared at pH 9 gave a conversion of 1.4%, a PO selectivity of 99%, and a H-2 efficiency of 17%. The turnover frequency for PO production based on total gold increased on going to the sample prepared at pH 9. Thus, it is concluded that very small An particles (about I nm) are the most active for epoxidation, whereas larger An particles (about 2 nm) are less active because they promote direct H-2 oxidation to H2O. X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy results indicated that at reaction conditions, the small particles had partially oxidized gold but the larger particles had metallic gold, suggesting that the smaller particles had high coverage of oxygen or oxygen-derived species. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available