4.7 Review

Inhibition of histone deacetylation: A strategy for tumor radiosensitization

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 26, Pages 4051-4056

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6202

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, strategies to enhance tumor radiosensitivity have begun to focus on targeting the molecules and processes that regulate cellular radioresponse. A molecular target that has begun to receive considerable attention is histone acetylation. Histone acetylation is determined by the dynamic interaction of two families of enzymes: histone acetylases and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Histone acetylation plays a role in regulating chromatin structure and gene expression two parameters that have long been considered determinants of radioresponse. As a means of modifying histone acetylation status, considerable effort has been put into the development of inhibitors of HDAC activity. This has led to the generation of a relatively large number of structurally diverse compounds that can inhibit HDAC activity resulting in histone hyperacetylation. Many of the newer HDAC inhibitor compounds have been designed with better bioavailability or pharmacology than the first-generation compounds. Whereas a number of these second-generation HDAC inhibitors have antitumor activity in preclinical cancer models when delivered as single agents, early clinical data demonstrate only cytostasis when used as monotherapy. However, recent preclinical studies have indicated that HDAC inhibitors from structurally diverse classes can enhance both the in vitro and in vivo radiosensitivity of human tumor cell lines generated from a spectrum of solid tumors. HDAC inhibitors are in clinical trials as single modalities, in combination with chemotherapeutic agents, and recently, in combination with radiotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available