4.6 Article

Effects of old age on human skeletal muscle energetics during fatiguing contractions with and without blood flow

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 583, Issue 3, Pages 1093-1105

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.138362

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01AG21094, R01 AG021094] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently reported lower glycolytic flux (ATP(GLY)) and increased reliance on oxidative ATP synthesis (ATP(OX)) in contracting muscle of older compared to young humans. To further investigate this age-related difference in the pathways of ATP synthesis, we used magnetic resonance spectroscopy to determine the rates of ATP(OX), ATP(GLY) and net phosphocreatine hydrolysis in vivo during maximal muscle contractions under free-flow (FF) and ischaemic (ISC) conditions in the ankle dorsiflexors of 20 young (27 +/- 3 years; 10 male, 10 female) and 18 older (70 +/- 5 years; 10 male, 8 female) adults. We hypothesized that ATP(GLY) would be higher in young compared to old during FF contractions, but that old would be unable to increase ATP(GLY) during ISC to match that of the young, which would suggest impaired glycolytic ATP synthesis with old age. Peak glycolytic flux during FF was lower in older (0.8 +/- 0.1 mm ATP s(-1)) compared to young (1.4 +/- 0.1 mm ATP s(-1), P < 0.001) subjects. During ISC, peak ATP(GLY) increased in old to a level similar to that of young (1.4 +/- 0.2 mm ATP s(-1), 1.3 +/- 0.2 mm ATP s(-1), respectively; P = 0.86), suggesting that glycolytic function remains intact in aged muscle in vivo. Notably, older adults fatigued less than young during both FF and ISC (P <= 0.004). These results provide novel evidence of unimpaired in vivo glycolytic function in the skeletal muscle of older adults during maximal isometric dorsiflexion, and suggest a potential role for differences in metabolic economy and as a result, metabolite accumulation, in the fatigue resistance of the old.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available