4.2 Article

Third-generation arnphiphilic conetworks. III. Permeabilities and mechanical properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART A-POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 18, Pages 4276-4283

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pola.22170

Keywords

amphiphilic conetworks; diffusion; immunoisolation; mechanical properties; membranes; permeability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While two of our earlier papers on poly(dimethyl acryl amide)/polymethylhydrosiloxane/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMAAm/PMHS/PDMS) amphiphilic conet-works concerned synthesis and biological properties, respectively, the present contribution focuses on oxygen and insulin permeabilities, and select mechanical properties. We show that by increasing the PDMA-Am content from 20 to 60% (i.e., by decreasing the hydrophobic content from 80 to 40%), oxygen permeabilities decrease from similar to 240 to similar to 130 barrers. Evidently, oxygen permeability is a function of the sum of the oxyphilic components, PDMS + PMHS, in the conetworks. In contrast, insulin permeability is a function of the hydrophilic component, and reaches a desirable 1.5 x 10(-7) cm(2)/s at 61% PDMAAm. We also studied the permeabilities of glucose, dextran, and albumin through a PDMAAm(61)/PMHS(6)/PDMS(33) membrane and found, unsurprisingly, that the permeability of these molecules follows their hydrodynamic radii, and we project that the permeability of IgG is infinitesimally low. Tensile strengths and ultimate elongations of water-swollen membranes are also a function of conetwork composition: by increasing the PDMAAm content from 30 to 60%, strengths decrease from 1.6 to 1.2 MPa, and elongations from similar to 60 to similar to 40%. Overall, the permeabilities and the mechanical properties of these membranes are appropriate for implantation and, specifically, for immunoisolation of living tissue. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available