4.7 Article

3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine self-administration is abolished in serotonin transporter knockout mice

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 669-679

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.005

Keywords

5-HT; DA; ecstasy; food and water operant responding; in vivo microdialysis; nucleus accumbens; prefrontal cortex

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [5R01 DA 016768] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The neurobiological mechanism underlying the reinforcing effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the contribution of the serotonin transporter (SERT) in MDMA selfadministration behavior by using knockout (KC) mice deficient in SERT. Methods: Knockout mice and wild-type (WT) littermates were trained to acquire intravenous self-administration of MDMA (0, .03, .06, .125,, and .25 mg/kg/infusion) on a fixed ratio 1 (FRI) schedule of reinforcement. Additional groups of mice were trained to obtain food and water to rule out operant responding impairments. Microdialysis studies were performed to evaluate dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) extracellular levels in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC), respectively, after acute MDMA (10 mg/kg). Results: None of the MDMA doses tested maintained intravenous self-administration in KO animals, whereas WT mice acquired responding for MDMA. Acquisition of operant responding for food and water was delayed in KO mice, but no differences between genotypes were observed on the last day of training. MDMA increased DA extracellular levels to a similar extent in the NAC of WT and KO mice. Conversely, extracellular concentrations of 5-HT in the PFC were increased following MDMA only in WT mice. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence for the specific involvement of SERT in MDMA reinforcing properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available