4.7 Article

Iron-chelating agents never suppress Fenton reaction but participate in quenching spin-trapped radicals

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 599, Issue 2, Pages 315-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.08.008

Keywords

electron spin resonance; 5,5-dimethyl-l-pyrroline N-oxide; hydroxyl radical; Fenton reaction; ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydroxyl radical formation by Fenton reaction in the presence of an iron-chelating agent such as EDTA was traced by two different assay methods; an electron spin resonance (ESR) spin-trapping method with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), and high Performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection with terephthalic acid (TPA), a fluorescent probe for hydroxyl radicals. From the ESR spin-trapping measurement, it was observed that EDTA seemed to suppress hydroxyl radical formation with the increase of its concentration. On the other hand, hydroxyl radical formation by Fenton reaction was not affected by EDTA monitored by HPLC assay. Similar inconsistent effects of other iron-chelating agents such as nitrylotriacetic acid (NTA), diethylenetriamine penta acetic acid (DTPA), oxalate and citrate were also observed. On the addition of EDTA solution to the reaction mixture 10 min after the Fenton reaction started, when hydroxyl radical formation should have almost ceased but the ESR signal of DMPO-OH radicals could be detected, it was observed that the DMPO-OH center dot signal disappeared rapidly. With the simultaneous addition of Fe(II) solution and EDTA after the Fenton reaction ceased, the DMPO-OH center dot signal disappeared more rapidly. The results indicated that these chelating agents should enhance the quenching of [DMPO-OH](center dot) radicals by Fe(II), but they did not suppress Fenton reaction by forming chelates with iron ions. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available