4.7 Article

On the remote galactic globular cluster NGC 2419

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 667, Issue 1, Pages L61-L64

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/522000

Keywords

galaxy : halo; globular clusters : general; globular clusters : individual (NGC 2419); stars : horizontal-branch; stars : variables : other; techniques : photometric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new, deep (V similar to 26) study of the Galactic globular cluster NGC 2419 based on B, V, I time-series CCD photometry over about 10 years and extending beyond the cluster published tidal radius. We have identified 101 variable stars, of which 60 are new discoveries, doubling the known RR Lyrae stars and including 12 SX Phoenicis stars. The average period of the RR Lyrae stars (< P-ab > = 0.662 days and < P-c > = 0.366 days, for fundamental-mode-RRab-and first-overtone pulsators, respectively) and the position in the period-amplitude diagram both confirm that NGC 2419 is an Oosterhoff II cluster. The average apparent magnitude of the RR Lyrae stars is < V > = 20.31 +/- 0.01 (sigma = 0.06, 67 stars) and leads to the distance modulus mu(0) = 19.60 +/- 0.05. The color-magnitude diagram, reaching about 2.6 mag below the cluster turnoff, does not show clear evidence of multiple stellar populations. Cluster stars are found until r similar to 10.5', and possibly as far as r similar to 15', suggesting that the literature tidal radius might be underestimated. No extratidal structures are clearly detected in the data. NGC 2419 has many blue stragglers and a well-populated horizontal branch extending from the RR Lyrae stars down to an extremely blue tail ending with the blue hook, for the first time recognized in this cluster. The red giant branch is narrow, ruling out significant metallicity spreads. Our results seem to disfavor the interpretation of NGC 2419 as either having an extragalactic origin or being the relict of a dwarf galaxy tidally disrupted by the Milky Way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available