4.7 Article

Optical-to-mid-infrared observations of Lyα galaxies at z≈5 in the Hubble ultra deep field:: A young and low-mass population

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 667, Issue 1, Pages 49-59

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/519485

Keywords

cosmology : miscellaneous; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : structure; surveys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-redshift galaxies selected on the basis of strong Ly alpha emission tend to be young and have small physical sizes. We show this by analyzing the spectral energy distribution of nine Ly alpha-emitting galaxies (LAEs) at 4.0 < z < 5.7 in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Rest-frame UV-to-optical (700 angstrom < lambda < 7500 angstrom) luminosities, or upper limits, are used to constrain old stellar populations. We derive best-fit, as well as maximally massive and maximally old, properties of all nine objects. We show that these faint and distant objects are all very young, most likely only a few million years old, and not massive, the mass in stars being approximate to 10(6)-10(8) M-circle dot . Deep Spitzer Infrared Array Camera observations of these objects, even in cases where the object was not detected, proved crucial in constraining the masses of these objects. The space density of these objects, approximate to 1.25 x 10(-4) Mpc(-3), is comparable to previously reported space densities of LAEs at moderate-to-high redshifts. These Ly alpha galaxies show modest star formation rates of approximate to 8 M-circle dot yr(-1), which is nevertheless strong enough to have allowed them to assemble their stellar mass in less than a few million years. These sources appear to have small physical sizes, usually smaller than 1 kpc, and are also rather concentrated. They are likely to be some of the least massive and youngest high-redshift galaxies observed to date.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available