4.7 Article

Extreme properties of GRB 061007:: a highly energetic or a highly collimated burst?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 380, Issue 3, Pages 1041-1052

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12138.x

Keywords

ISM : jets and outflows; gamma-rays : bursts; gamma-rays : observations

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/E001173/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001173/1, PPA/A/R/2003/00380] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GRB 061007 was the brightest gamma-ray burst (GRB) to be detected by Swift and was accompanied by an exceptionally luminous afterglow that had a V-band magnitude < 11. 1 at 80 s after the prompt emission. From the start of the Swift observations the afterglow decayed as a power law with a slope of a(x) = 1.66 +/- 0.01 in the X-ray and a(opt), = 1.64 +/- 0.01 in the UV/optical, up to the point that it was no longer detected above background in the optical or X-ray bands. The brightness of this GRB and the similarity in the decay rate of the X-ray, optical and gamma-ray emission from 100s after the trigger distinguish this burst from others and present a challenge to the fireball model. The lack of a cooling or jet break in the afterglow Up to similar to 10(5) s constrains any model that can produce the large luminosity observed in GRB 061007, which we found to require either an excessively large kinetic energy or highly collimated outflow. Analysis of the multiwavelength spectral and high-resolution temporal data taken with Swift suggests an early time jet break to be a more plausible scenario than a highly energetic GRB. This must have occurred within 80 s of the prompt emission, which places an upper limit on the jet opening angle of theta(j) = 0.8 degrees. Such a highly collimated outflow resolves the energy budget problem presented in a spherical emission model, reducin the isotropic-equivalent energy of this burst to E-gamma(corr) = 10(50) erg, consistent with other GRBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available