4.7 Article

Characterization of low-substituted hydroxypropylated canna starch

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1123-1132

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.013

Keywords

canna starch; hydroxypropylated starch; hydroxypropylation; paste; gel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starch isolated from rhizomes of edible canna (Canna edulis) was hydroxypropylated with propylene oxide at 40 degrees C and pH 5.5, and its physicochemical, morphological, thermal and gel textural properties were investigated. The extent of hydroxypropylation measured as molar substitution (MS) was 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.07 and 0.11 when propylene oxide at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 and 10.0% (v/w), respectively, was used. Granular size and shape, as well as X-ray diffraction pattern of the modified starches, were similar to those of the native starch. Investigation on pasting properties of 6% starch by using Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) showed that pasting temperature and setback value of the modified starches decreased by 1-8 degrees C and 16-59%, respectively, whereas peak viscosity increased by 28-106%, compared to the native starch. Hydroxypropylated starches had lower gelatinization parameters (T-o, T-p, T-c and triangle H) than those of the native starch. Gelatinization temperature (T-p) of the modified starches was in the range of 60-69 degrees C, whereas that of the native starch was 70 degrees C. Hardness value of canna starch gel was considerably lowered by hydroxypropylation. The gel of native canna starch was opaque, whereas that of the hydroxypropylated starches with MS of 0.07 and 0.11 was still clear after being kept at 4 degrees C for 7 days. Stability of the canna starch to low pH and high shear was insignificantly altered, but freeze-thaw stability was substantially improved by hydroxypropylation. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available