4.7 Article

I Zw 18 revisited with HST ACS and Cepheids:: New distance and age

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 667, Issue 2, Pages L151-L154

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/522368

Keywords

cepheids; galaxies : dwarf; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : individual (I Zw 18); galaxies : irregular; galaxies : stellar content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new V- and I-band HST ACS photometry of I Zw 18, the most metal-poor blue compact dwarf (BCD) galaxy in the nearby universe. It has been argued in the past that I Zw 18 is a very young system that started forming stars only less than or similar to 500 Myr ago, but other work has hinted that older ( greater than or similar to 1 Gyr) red giant branch (RGB) stars may also exist. Our new data, once combined with archival HST ACS data, provide a deep and uncontaminated optical color-magnitude diagram (CMD) that now strongly indicates an RGB. The RGB tip (TRGB) magnitude yields a distance modulus (m - M)(0) = 31.30 +/- 0.17 i.e., D = 18.2 +/- 1.5 Mpc. The time- series nature of our observations allows us to also detect and characterize for the first time three classical Cepheids in I Zw 18. The time- averaged Cepheid < V > and < I > magnitudes are compared to the VI reddening-free Wesenheit relation predicted from new nonlinear pulsation models specifically calculated at the metallicity of I Zw 18. For the one bona fide classical Cepheid with a period of 8.63 days this implies a distance modulus. The m - M)(0) =31.42 +/- 0.26 other two Cepheids have unusually long periods (125.0 and 129.8 days) but are consistent with this distance. The coherent picture that emerges is that I Zw 18 is farther away than previously assumed and older than suggested by some previous works. The presence of an RGB population rules out the possibility that I Zw 18 is a truly primordial galaxy formed recently (z less than or similar to 0.1) in the local universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available