4.7 Article

Susceptibility to nicotine dependence: The development and assessment of nicotine dependence in youth 2 study

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 120, Issue 4, Pages E974-e983

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-0027

Keywords

nicotine; tobacco; adolescents; addiction; dependence

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA14666] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this work was to identify characteristics that predict progression from the first inhalation of a cigarette to dependence. We studied a cohort of 1246 public school 6th-graders in 6 Massachusetts communities ( mean age at baseline: 12.2 years). METHODS. We conducted a 4-year prospective study using 11 interviews. We assessed 45 risk factors and measured diminished autonomy over tobacco with the Hooked on Nicotine Checklist and evaluated tobacco dependence according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Cox proportional-hazards models were used. RESULTS. Among 217 youths who had inhaled from a cigarette, the loss of autonomy over tobacco was predicted by feeling relaxed the first time inhaling from a cigarette and depressed mood. Tobacco dependence was predicted by feeling relaxed, familiarity with Joe Camel, novelty seeking, and depressed mood. CONCLUSIONS. Once exposure to nicotine had occurred, remarkably few risk factors for smoking consistently contributed to individual differences in susceptibility to the development of dependence or loss of autonomy. An experience of relaxation in response to the first dose of nicotine was the strongest predictor of both dependence and lost autonomy. This association was not explained by trait anxiety or any of the other measured psychosocial factors. These results are discussed in relation to the theory that the process of dependence is initiated by the first dose of nicotine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available