4.3 Article

Gender-associated differences in pharmacokinetics and anti-arrhythmic effects of flecainide in Japanese patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmia

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 10, Pages 951-957

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-007-0348-7

Keywords

flecainide; gender-associated difference; pharmacokinetics; anti-arrhythmic efficacy; CYP2D6

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective We examined the effect of gender-associated differences in pharmacokinetics on the anti-arrhythmic effects of flecainide in Japanese patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmia and in healthy subjects. Methods The study population comprised 72 outpatients (52 males and 20 females) treated with oral flecainide for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Serum flecainide concentrations were determined by use of high-performance liquid chromatography. The anti-arrhythmic efficacy of flecainide was assessed for at least 2 months through evaluation of symptomatology, electrocardiograms, and Holter monitoring. Pharmacokinetics of flecainide after a single 50-mg dose was examined in 14 healthy subjects (7 males and 7 females). Results The daily dose of flecainide did not differ between males and females (2.87 +/- 0.68 versus 2.92 +/- 0.90 mg/kg). The serum flecainide concentration was significantly lower in males than in females (315 +/- 151 versus 408 +/- 184 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Clinically relevant efficacy of flecainide was achieved significantly (P < 0.05) less often in male patients (31 of 52; 60%) than in female patients (19 of 20; 95%). We confirmed that nonrenal clearance of flecainide among healthy subjects was significantly higher in males than in females (0.77 +/- 0.16 versus 0.57 +/- 0.06 L h(-1) kg(-1), P < 0.05). Conclusions Our results suggest that the anti-arrhythmic efficacy of flecainide differed between males and females because of gender-associated differences in pharmacokinetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available