4.6 Article

Mechanisms of provitamin A (carotenoid) and vitamin A (retinol) transport into and out of intestinal Caco-2 cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 10, Pages 2283-2294

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M700263-JLR200

Keywords

retinoids; chylomicrons; glyburide; ATP binding cassette, subfamily A, member 1; scavenger receptor class B type I; Niemann-Pick disease type C1 gene-like 1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanisms of intestinal retinol (ROL) and carotenoid transport. When differentiated Caco-2 cells were incubated with ROL for varying times, cellular ROL plateaued within 2 h, whereas retinyl ester (RE) formation increased continuously. ROL and RE efflux into basolateral medium (BM) increased linearly with time, ROL in the nonlipoprotein fraction and REs in chylomicrons (CMs). In contrast to carotenoids, ROL uptake was proportional to ROL concentration (0.5-110 mu M). ROL efflux into BM occurred via two processes: a) a saturable process at low concentrations (< 10 mu M) and b) a nonsaturable process at higher concentrations. When ROL-loaded cells were maintained on retinoid-free medium, free ROL, but not REs, was secreted into BM. Glyburide significantly reduced ROL efflux but not ROL uptake. Inhibition of ABCA1 protein expression by small interfering RNAs decreased ROL efflux but not carotenoid efflux. Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) inhibition did not affect ROL transport but decreased carotenoid uptake. The present data suggest that a) ROL enters intestinal cells by diffusion, b) ROL efflux is partly facilitated, probably by the basolateral transporter ABCA1, and c) newly synthesized REs, but not preformed esters, are incorporated into CM and secreted. In contrast to ROL transport, carotenoid uptake is mediated by the apical transporter SR-BI, and carotenoid efflux occurs exclusively via their secretion in CM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available