4.8 Article

Fetal microchimerism in women with breast cancer

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 19, Pages 9035-9038

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4209

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI41721] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fetal microchimerism (FMc) describes long-term persistence of small numbers of fetal-derived allogeneic cells in the mother. Although FMc has been implicated as a mechanism of autoimmune disease, it may confer a beneficial effect with immune surveillance of malignant cells. We hypothesized that allogeneic FMc imparts a protective effect against breast cancer. Two observations provided a rationale for the study hypothesis. First, allogeneic cells convey risk reduction for recurrent malignancy in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Second, reduced risk of breast cancer is well recognized among parous compared with nulliparous women. As an initial test of the hypothesis, we investigated 82 women, 35 with breast cancer and 47 who were healthy, for male DNA in peripheral blood, presumed from a prior pregnancy with a male fetus. The prevalence and levels of male DNA were determined by real-time quantitative PCR for the Y chromosome-specific gene DYS14 in DNA extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. FMc was found significantly more often in healthy women than women with breast cancer (43% versus 14%, respectively). Considering the absence of FMc as a risk factor, the odds ratio was 4.4 [95% confidence intervals (95% Cl), 1.34-16.99; P = 0.0061. Restricting analysis to women known to had given birth to a son, the odds ratio was 5.9 (95% Cl, 1.26-6.69; P = 0.01). Our findings indicate that allogeneic FMc may contribute to reduction in risk of breast cancer. Further studies are indicated and, if confirmed, extended studies to examine whether allogeneic immune surveillance from FMc is deficient in women with breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available