4.6 Article

Geometry and brittle deformation of the subducting Nazca Plate, Central Chile and Argentina

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 171, Issue 1, Pages 419-434

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03483.x

Keywords

aseismic ridge; earthquake location; earthquake-source mechanism; seismotectonics; Nazca Plate; subduction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use data from the Chile Argentina Geophysical Experiment (CHARGE) broad-band seismic deployment to refine past observations of the geometry and deformation within the subducting slab in the South American subduction zone between 30 degrees S and 36 degrees S. This region contains a zone of flat slab subduction where the subducting Nazca Plate flattens at a depth of similar to 100 km and extends similar to 300 km eastward before continuing its descent into the mantle. We use a grid-search multiple-event earthquake relocation technique to relocate 1098 events within the subducting slab and generate contours of the Wadati-Benioff zone. These contours reflect slab geometries from previous studies of intermediate-depth seismicity in this region with some small but important deviations. Our hypocentres indicate that the shallowest portion of the flat slab is associated with the inferred location of the subducting Juan Fernandez Ridge at 31 degrees S and that the slab deepens both to the south and the north of this region. We have also determined first motion focal mechanisms for similar to 180 of the slab earthquakes. The subhorizontal T-axis solutions for these events are almost entirely consistent with a slab pull interpretation, especially when compared to our newly inferred slab geometry. Deviations of T-axes from the direction of slab dip may be explained with a gap within the subducting slab below 150 km in the vicinity of the transition from flat to normal subducting geometry around 33 degrees S.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available