4.5 Article

Evolution of nova-dependent splicing regulation in the brain

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages 1838-1847

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U105185858] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000102, M01-RR00102] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS034389, R01 NS040955, NS40955, R01 NS34389] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U105185858] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [MC_U105185858] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A large number of alternative exons are spliced with tissue-specific patterns, but little is known about how such patterns have evolved. Here, we study the conservation of the neuron-specific splicing factors Nova1 and Nova2 and of the alternatively spliced exons they regulate in mouse brain. Whereas Nova RNA binding domains are 94% identical across vertebrate species, Nova-dependent splicing silencer and enhancer elements (YCAY clusters) show much greater divergence, as less than 50% of mouse YCAY clusters are conserved at orthologous positions in the zebrafish genome. To study the relation between the evolution of tissue-specific splicing and YCAY clusters, we compared the brain-specific splicing of Nova-regulated exons in zebrafish, chicken, and mouse. The presence of YCAY clusters in lower vertebrates invariably predicted conservation of brain-specific splicing across species, whereas their absence in lower vertebrates correlated with a loss of alternative splicing. We hypothesize that evolution of Nova-regulated splicing in higher vertebrates proceeds mainly through changes in cis-acting elements, that tissue-specific splicing might in some cases evolve in a single step corresponding to evolution of a YCAY cluster, and that the conservation level of YCAY clusters relates to the functions encoded by the regulated RNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available