4.5 Article

Humanized MC1R transgenic mice reveal human specific receptor function

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages 2341-2348

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddm191

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U127527200] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [MC_U127527200] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U127527200] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The melanocortin receptor, MC1R, is a key regulator of pigmentation in mammals, and is necessary for production of dark eumelanin pigment. Human MC1R variants with reduced or absent function are associated with red hair; mouse mutants result in yellow fur. Previous reports indicate differences between mouse and human receptors in their sensitivity to, and requirement for, alpha MSH agonist. We have generated a transgenic mouse model in which coat pigmentation is mediated solely by human MC1R. Although the hair pigment pattern is superficially normal, we show the human receptor is more sensitive to exogenous ligand than mouse Mc1r. Furthermore, although the endogenous receptor antagonist, agouti signalling protein, blocks activation of human MC1R, its action is unlike that on the mouse receptor in that it does not generate an inverse signal. In transfected cells, both receptors show ligand independent signalling. However, in transgenic mice, the human receptor does not elicit significant eumelanin synthesis in absence of ligand, in contrast to the mouse receptor which gives normal eumelanogenesis without ligand. Thus, the mouse model recapitulates the observation that humans mutated in POMC, the melanocortin precursor gene, lack eumelanin and have red hair. We suggest this apparent paradox can be explained by the much lower receptor number expressed in human versus mouse melanocytes, resulting in a much lower endogenous signalling in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available