4.8 Article

Hypoadiponectinemia accelerates hepatic tumor formation in a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis mouse model

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 556-564

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.03.020

Keywords

nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); adiponectin; reactive oxygen species (ROS); obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Adipose tissue produces a number of adipocytokines, including adiponectin, leptin, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Obesity, which is associated with low plasma adiponectin levels, is an independent risk factor for various liver diseases including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The aim of this study was to examine the effects of adiponectin on the progression of NASH to cirrhosis and tumor formation using adiponectin-knockout (KO) mice. Methods: Using a choline-deficient L-amino acid-defined (CDAA) diet-induced mouse NASH model, liver histology and oxidative stress markers were investigated in KO and wild-type (WT) mice. Results: Hepatic steatosis was enhanced to a greater extent in KO mice, compared to WT mice after a 1-week CDAA diet. After 24 weeks, 6 out of 14 KO mice developed liver cirrhosis and hepatic tumors, whereas the 15 WT mice showed only simple steatosis. In KO mice, hepatic cytochrome P450 2E1 levels were upregulated, and markers of oxidative stress (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine-positive cells) were significantly increased compared with WT mice. Conclusions: Our results indicate that lack of adiponectin enhances the progression of hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, and hepatic tumor formation in an animal model of NASH. Hypoadiponectinemia in obesity could be a risk factor for NASH-related hepatic tumor formation. (C) 2007 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available