4.3 Article

Biochemical and histological characterization of tomato mutants

Journal

ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 573-585

Publisher

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37652012005000022

Keywords

antioxidant enzymes; leaf and root anatomy; oxidative stress; Solanum lycopersicum

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/54676-0]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPqBrazil)
  3. FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochemical responses inherent to antioxidant systems as well. morphological, and anatomical properties of photomorphogenic, hormonal, and developmental tomato mutants were investigated. Compared to the non-mutant Micro-Tom (MT), we observed that the malondialdehyde (MDA) content was enhanced in the diageotmpica (dgt) and luteseent (!) mutants, whilst the highest levels of hydrogen peroxide (11,02) were observed in high.piginent.1 (hp!) and aurea (au) mutants. The analyses of antioxidant enzymes revealed that all mutants exhibited reduced catalase (CAT) activity when compared to MT. Guaiacol peroxidase (GPDX) was enhanced in both sitiens (sit) and notabilis (not) mutants, whereas in not mutant there was an increase in ascorbate peroxidase (APX). Based on PAGE analysis, the activities of glutathione reductase (GR) isoforms Ill, IV, V and VI were increased in / leaves, while the activity of superoxide dism.utase (SOD) isoform Ill was reduced in leaves of sit, epi, Never ripe (Nr) and green flesh (gf) mutants. Microscopic analyses revealed that hp/ and au showed an increase in leaf intercellular spaces, whereas sit exhibited a decrease. The au and hpl mutants also exhibited a decreased in the number of leaf trichonies. The characterization of these mutants is essential for their future use in plant development and ecophysioloay studies, such as abiotic and biotic stresses on the oxidative metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available