4.4 Article

Using optical coherence tomography to evaluate skin sun damage and precancer

Journal

LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 9, Pages 687-695

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20573

Keywords

actinic keratosis; imaging; skin cancer; image processing

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA027502-26, P01 CA027502-22, P01 CA027502-19, P01 CA027502-21, P01 CA027502-20, P01 CA027502-24, P01 CA027502, P01 CA027502-24S1, P01 CA027502-25S1, P01 CA027502-20S1, P01 CA27502, P01 CA027502-23A1, P01 CA027502-25] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [T32 EB000809-01, T32 EB000809-03, T32 EB000809-05, T32 EB000809, T32 EB000809-02, T32 EB000809-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a depth resolved imaging modality that may aid in identifying sun damaged skin and the precancerous condition actinic keratosis (AK). Study Design/Materials and Methods: OCT images were acquired of 112 patients at 2 sun protected and 2 sun exposed sites, with a subsequent biopsy. Each site received a dermatological evaluation, a histological diagnosis, and a solar elastosis (SE) score. OCT images were examined visually and statistically analyzed. Results: Characteristic OCT image features were identified of sun protected, undiseased, sun damaged, and AK skin. A statistically significant difference (P <0.0001) between the average attenuation values of skin with minimal and severe solar elastosis was observed. Significant differences (P <0.0001) were also found between undiseased skin and AK using a gradient analysis. Using image features, AK could be distinguished from undiseased skin with 86% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Conclusion: OCT has the potential to guide biopsies and provide non-invasive measures of skin sun damage and disease state, possibly increasing efficiency of chemo-preventive agent trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available