4.3 Article

Rare earth element and yttrium geochemistry applied to the genetic study of cryolite ore at the Pitinga Mine (Amazon, Brazil)

Journal

ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 719-733

Publisher

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37652008000400012

Keywords

cryolite; REE; Y; Pitinga; Amazonia

Funding

  1. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient fico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul/Programa de Apoio a Nucleos de Excelencia (CNPq-FAPERGS/PRONEX) [04/0825-3]
  4. CNPq [306591/2006-5, 308498/2005-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work aims at the geochemical study of Pitinga cryolite mineralization through REE and Y analyses in disseminated and massive cryolite ore deposits, as well as in fluorite occurrences. REE signatures in fluorite and cryolite are similar to those in the Madeira albite granite. The highest 6 REE values are found in magmatic cryolite (677 to 1345 ppm); 6 REE is lower in massive cryolite. Average values for the different cryolite types are 10.3 ppm, 6.66 ppm and 8.38 ppm (for nucleated, caramel and white types, respectively). Disseminated fluorite displays higher 6 REE values (1708 and 1526 ppm) than fluorite in late veins (34.81ppm). Yttrium concentration is higher in disseminated fluorite and in magmatic cryolite. The evolution of several parameters (REEtotal, LREE/HREE, Y) was followed throughout successive stages of evolution in albite granites and associated mineralization. At the end of the process, late cryolite was formed with low REEtotal content. REE data indicate that the MCD was formed by, and the disseminated ore enriched by (additional formation of hydrothermal disseminated cryolite), hydrothermal fluids, residual from albite granite. The presence of tetrads is poorly defined, although nucleated, caramel and white cryolite types show evidence for tetrad effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available