4.7 Article

Electrophoretic and Western blot analyses of the lipopolysaccharide and glycocalyx of Flavobacterium psychrophilum

Journal

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 770-780

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2007.02.005

Keywords

Flavobacterium psychrophilum; coldwater disease; rainbow trout fry syndrome; lipopolysaccharide; glycocalyx

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flavobacterium psychrophilum is the aetiological agent of bacterial coldwater disease (CWD) and rainbow trout fry syndrome (RTFS) and it has emerged as one of the most significant bacterial pathogens in salmonid aquaculture worldwide. Previous studies have suggested that the O-polysaccharide (O-PS) component of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of F. psychrophilum is highly immunogenic and may be involved in eliciting a protective immune response in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum). In the present study, SDS-PAGE and Western blotting techniques were used to analyse the carbohydrate antigens of F. psychrophilum. Our analysis identified two distinct carbohydrate-banding patterns. One banding pattern corresponds with LPS, and we hypothesise that the other carbohydrate-banding pattern is that of the loosely associated glycocalyx of F. psychrophilum. Electron microscopy of F. psychrophilum cells immunogold labelled with a monoclonal antibody specific for this banding pattern supports this hypothesis as the outermost layer of the bacterium was heavily labelled. This is a significant finding because the immunogenic antigens that have been referred to as the O-PS of LPS, and implicated as potential vaccine candidate antigens, appear to be components of the glycocalyx of F. psychrophilum. This research suggests that the glycocalyx of F. psychrophilum may be an important antigen to consider for the development of a vaccine to control CWD and RTFS. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available