4.4 Article

Sequence variation in α-methylacyl-CoA racemase and risk of early-onset and familial prostate cancer

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 67, Issue 14, Pages 1507-1513

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20642

Keywords

prostate; cancer; SNP; association

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA79596, P50 CA69568, P30 CA46592] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Expression of the alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) gene has been established as a sensitive and specific biomarker for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. An initial study has also suggested that the risk of familial (but not sporadic) prostate cancer may be associated with germline variation in the AMACR gene. METHODS. In a study of brothers discordant for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (including 449 affected and 394 unaffected men) from 332 familial and early-onset prostate cancer families, we used conditional logistic regression and family-based association tests to investigate the association between prostate cancer and five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNI's) tagging common haplotype variation within the coding and regulatory regions of AMACR. RESULTS. The strongest evidence for prostate cancer association was for SNP rs3195676, with an estimated odds ratio of 0.58 (95% confidence interval = 0.38-0.90; P = 0.01 for a recessive model). This non-synonymous SNP (nsSNP) results in a methionine-to-valine substitution at codon 9 (M9V) in exon 2 of the AMACR gene. Three additional nsSNPs showed suggestive evidence for prostate cancer association (P <= 0.10). CONCLUSIONS. Our results confirm an initial report of association between the AMACR gene and the risk of familial prostate cancer. These findings emphasize the value of studying early-onset and familial prostate cancer when attempting to identify genetic variation associated with prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available